Saturday, 8 November 2014

Nova Scotia Electricity System Review

On October 26, 2014, I sent this response to Nova Scotia's Summary Report regarding Emerging Technology and Market Trend Studies


I began by emphasizing that addressing demand, supply and price in a system that is close to 100 percent dependent on a privately owned, and profit-driven grid system is a great challenge... despite the moderating role played by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.

Price, we have learned, becomes a heightened problem when a province is committed to replacing the use of fossil fuels with cleaner, renewable energy. Cleaner, renewable energy comes at a higher price and for-profit organizations like NS Power are reluctant to pay more to generate energy that they want to sell at a profit. And so Nova Scotia has committed to underwriting much of this increased cost... putting the taxpayer and the consumer on the hook.

It needs to be noted that within the chambers of our municipal council there has not been an opportunity to discuss the Nova Scotia Electricity System Review. Therefore, the comments contained in this response are attributable to me solely. There is no intention for the opinions and views below to be seen as a position reached through discussion within the chambers of the Municipality of the County of Kings. My response to the review was provided as outlined below under five key headings. I trust you will find my responses of interest. I would welcome any feedback you may have.
  • Clean, “Electric-System-Free”, Renewable Heat in Rural Communities
  • Producing Electricity from Municipal Solid Waste
  • Reduction of Reliance on the Nova Scotia Power Grid System
  • Expanded Role for Nova Scotia Municipalities in Home Energy Conversation and Efficiency
    Examples:
    Halifax's Solar City
    Richmond County's Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Project
  • Collaborative Energy Systems
Clean, “Electric-System-Free”, Renewable Heat in Rural Communities

Many Nova Scotian homes (estimated at approximately 100,000) burn hardwood as their major source of heat each winter.

This renewable fuel makes little or no demand on the electrical system during winter months when demand for electricity triples.

This year, many families have experienced difficulty accessing this fuel. At least two factors could be contributing to this problem.

  1. Using wood for the generation of electricity at the Port Hawkesbury biomass facility.
  2. Exporting chipped hard wood for use in the manufacture of wood beams. This appears to be a new market with China for Canadian hardwood that is being discussed in rural communities.

It is notable that these uses require the transportation of wood over long distances. This use competes with local wood burning as a thermal heat source. This use requires relatively little transportation and reducing the need to burn fossil fuels for transportation.

Once, or if, the availability of hardwood for home space heating becomes scarce homeowners will be forced to switch to other forms of heat that may be much less efficient and could also create a greater need for electrical generation.

Nova Scotia needs to be more mindful of the choices being made.

Creating electricity from biomass that is then used by homes in the form of electrical heat is much less efficient that using biomass for local space heatiing through the use of wood burning stoves.

Producing Electricity from Municipal Solid Waste


Environmental stewardship has been greatly enhanced by forward looking policies in Nova Scotia and the creation of waste authorities in the 90s.

In recent years the Valley Authority has explored the diversion of municipal solid waste from the Chester landfill site. Hauling of waste there involves a cost of approximately $2 Million in trucking and tipping fees each year. Advances in gasification technology points to opportunities for not only using MSW as feed stock but also sewage where environmental standards can be met (applied in this way “sewage” can be viewed as an a renewable fuel).

Further inquiry into such sources of “biomass” needs to be considered as part of the Nova Scotia Electricity System. Efficiency, sound environmental stewardship, energy security and cost-effective management by municipalities of their solid waste could all be positively impacted by the potential use of these feed stocks as “biomass”.

Reduction of Reliance on the Nova Scotia Power Grid System


Earlier this year, the Electricity Reform Act opened up the renewable energy market to allow independent energy providers to produce electricity and retail it directly to customers. This cornerstone for diversification needs to be built upon. The anticipation of regulations that will allow Nova Scotians to purchase renewable energy directly from producers, other than Nova Scotia Power, by late 2015 is a welcome change.

Will the Department of Energy actively promote and offer support to local communities and not-for-profit organizations to engage in this opportunity?

Can incentives be provided, local EcoDistricts be created?

Will government buildings lead the way as customers for local renewable energy production?

The answer to these questions will be critical to the successful diversification of: who retails renewable energy; who benefits from renewable energy; and at what price.

    Expanded Role for Nova Scotia Municipalities in Home Energy Conversation and Efficiency


As a municipal councillor I believe municipalities can play a more significant role in helping home-owners conserve and use energy more efficiently. This in turn reduces demand on the electricity system.

We already have at least two municipalities with recent initiatives that could be adapted more broadly.

Halifax's Solar City

This pilot project was launched in 2012. The program helps home owners assess the suitability of solar hot water heating for their location and home. It follows through with financing through the municipality and boosts “typical lifetime savings of over $20,000” and “average yearly greenhouse gas reductions of 1,700 kg.”

An electric system review needs to include an assessment of the impact of a broad-based application of this use of solar energy across municipalities.

Do we know what the reduction in energy use would be if every home in Nova Scotia that could use solar energy for hot water installed such a system?

Richmond County's Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Project

In September 2014, Richmond County became the first rural municipality in Canada to pass a bylaw that allows home-owners to finance energy efficiency upgrades to homes through an annual charge on their tax bill.

Efficiency Nova Scotia has worked closely with Richmond County to ensure that the program meets appropriate standards and can be implemented efficiently. If this program was adapted by other/all municipalities it could have a substantial impact, especially for homeowners who live in low-income circumstances. Eligible upgrades for access to low-cost municipal financing can include insulation (ceilings, exterior walls, basements, crawl spaces); draft proofing (weather stripping and caulking); installation of Energy Star windows, doors, skylights; etc. Efficiency Nova Scotia incentives can be automatically deducted to reduce the financed amount.

Collaborative Energy Systems


Collaboration and community-based initiatives are being embraced in several cities and towns across North America to build energy systems that gain efficiency through conservation of energy and/or more direct use of energy where it is produced.

Is there an opportunity for more active collaboration between municipalities, their planners and engineers, the Department of Energy, the Department of Municipal Relations and local communities, organizations and businesses?

Could such collaboration be aligned with new funding incentives (provincial grants and/or loans) as the current COMFIT program nears its end?
    Could partnerships between municipalities, the province and local communities help achieve energy security and self-sufficiency for Nova Scotians?

    What is the potential of collaboration within local communities with regard to efficiency and energy security for Nova Scotians?

The review does not adequately address the impacts possible if community collaboration was broadly supported and promoted by governments.

Friday, 17 October 2014

THE GREAT KINGS COUNTY CURBSIDE GIVEAWAY

A CURBSIDE GIVEAWAY WAS PROMOTED ACROSS KINGS COUNTY 
 FOR THE WEEKEND OF OCTOBER 25th & 26th. 

THEN THERE WAS RAIN, RAIN, RAIN AND VERY LITTLE PARTICIPATION. 

What do you think about this idea? Drop me an email and let me know.  It was not a fall-cleanup simply a giveaway of goods that could have a second life at another home. For more details---just click below! Or look at the successful Halifax program upon which this was modelled.



Tuesday, 7 October 2014

E-Business Tool Kit - Free online

Last month I attended a launch of an e-business toolkit at the CAP site of the Windsor Public Library.

The kit is aimed at directing new or developing businesses towards appropriate software and/or e-commerce opportunities.

The toolkit was developed by the Sobey School Business Development Centre (in partnership with the Province of Nova Scotia and the Nova Scotia Community Access Program). 

It was a very informative session. But as Councillor Atwater, who also attended, commented many small business owners could have benefitted from this session but most would be unlikely to have free time during daylight hours! 

It would be great to offer this session in Kings County as an evening session. I'll be looking into that.

In the meantime, if you wish to visit the site and take advantage of the toolkit. Here the link


Once you are there you can do an assessment of your business' current needs. It could prove to be a very helpful resource for some tech-savvy businesses or businesses that wish to make improvements in that way. 

The apps discussed at the seminar are accessible through the toolkit dependent on the needs assessment results they show up as suggestions to check out. Most are not free software and for very small businesses may not be affordable.

Deborah Innes from the CAP-Site in Windsor has just sent along links to apps that are free. Some are entirely free while others allow limited use before a paid subscription.

As always please do not hesitate to be in touch if you want to discuss anything in more detail 902.670.2949.




1
Dropboxhttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dropbox.android
2
Asanahttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.asana.app
3
Expensifyhttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.me.mobiexpensifyg
4
Google Drive
5
LinkedInhttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.linkedin.android
6
Yelphttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.yelp.android
7
Google Analytics
8
YouTube
9
Facebookhttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.facebook.katana
10
Hangoutshttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.talk
11
Sqaurehttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.squareup
12
Skydrivehttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.microsoft.skydrive
13
Trellohttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.trello
14
GotoMYPC
15
UrbanSpoonhttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.urbanspoon
16
Teamviewer
17
Google My Business
18
Amazon
19
Pintresthttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pinterest
20
Twitterhttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.twitter.android
21
FourSquare
22
Contactuallyhttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.contactually.app
23
Instagramhttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.instagram.android
24
Skypehttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.skype.raider
25
WebEx
26
Etsyhttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.etsy.android

Tuesday, 23 September 2014

Kings County Places $20 M Bet on Michelin Expansion

At a price of $1.9 million, 60 of 94-acres that are part of the Kings County Municipal Airport will be rezoned M2 and owned by Michelin by October, 2015, or no later than April 1, 2016.

July 28 2014 Frank
Magazine depiction
indicating County's
eagerness for Michelin deal
The agreement was signed, sealed and delivered by Warden Brothers and her Deputy Hirtle on September 22, immediately following a split vote of council.

With that portion gone the smaller parcel remaining becomes unusable as a municipal airport.

Councillors Atwater, Bishop, Winsor and I voted against executing the agreement. Councillor VanRooyen, out of the country on FCM business when the Special Council meeting was called, was also opposed. Why did the familiar 6 to 5 split in opinion so common in council chambers occur this time?

Yesterday, it was a matter of how much a councillor wanted to gamble with a $20 M asset.

Throughout the debate, the question remained of who would compensate the taxpayers of Kings County for loss of large capital investments at the airport if in the end there's no Michelin expansion to offset this loss.

Those opposed to the agreement promoted by both the CAO and Warden Brothers wanted simple conditions to the sale. These conditions would ensure the land, once sold, would be used for the intended purpose---an expansion of the tire manufacturing line---resulting in hundreds of needed jobs. With such conditions all councillors could have happily endorsed the agreement. If a guarantee of expansion could not be confirmed within a defined yet flexible timeframe, we wanted the land and airport to remain as a key asset of Kings County taxpayers.

The Final Report of CBCL's Waterville Airport Relocation Study (May 2013) shows 19 full time equivalent jobs at the airport and over a million spent annually on labour, goods and services. In addition it highlights annual owner operator draws close to $600 thousand (2012).

There may be a big Michelin bird in the bush but yesterday Kings County Council squandered an opportunity to keep a firm hold on a profitable and valuable airport until the bigger opportunity was in hand.

Warden Brothers and Deputy Hirtle were supported in their endorsement of Michelin's agreement by Councillors Best, Ennis, Lloyd and MacQuarrie. Supported by the CAO, the six put hope, faith and belief in the tire giant's stated intent, if not guarantee, to expand. That was a bold move. Perhaps it's a move these six would not have made if their personal assets had been on the line.

Each and every Kings County councillor is united in a desire to see Michelin expand. If that happens, the shortfalls of the agreement signed with Michelin will not matter. In the meantime I am greatly concerned.

If at the point of the sale's completion Kings County ends up with a 1.9 million dollar parking lot instead of the 20 million dollar asset the airport currently represents the good news spin placed by the Warden on the sale will no longer apply. Conditions tying the sale to a confirmed expansion and/or compensation for the lost of the airport in the absence of an expansion was simply good business that did not come to pass.

True, governments are keen to have big employers like Michelin in their neighbourhood. An example of balance however can be seen in Lexington, South Carolina, if not in Kings County. There government spent $47M to adjusting a highway system to facilitate expansion. However, a condition of repayment was part of that deal. When after 10-years expansion had not yet occurred repayment was brought into play and a plant was built.

What is known here is it's to Michelin's advantage to have land available.

Michelin's Grant Ferguson has succeeded in positioning his Waterville Plant to compete for the investment funds needed for any expansion. That's the silver, if precarious, lining here.

With fingers and toes crossed I hope for his success. Meanwhile, my opinion is Kings County business needs to be conducted on more solid ground than a wing and a prayer.

Friday, 19 September 2014

Open Farm Day Sunday September 21

The following farms are welcoming you through the farm gate on Sunday... Many with special treats and tours. 

Time to pack a picnic, put on a cosy fall sweater and comfortable shoes and make plans to visit several farms.

Hope to see you somewhere along the way.

Dempsey Corner Orchards
Hosts: David Bowlby & Allison Maher
Farm Type: Fruit & vegetable, U-pick & petting zoo
Address: 2717 Hwy 221, Aylesford, NS
Hours: 10 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Activities: Help bottle feed our baby lambs, kids and calf. Learn about our different coloured eggs. Wander through our orchards and fields and sample the fruits of our labours. Then enjoy a fresh baked muffin and coffee in a lawn chair in the sun.
Phone: (902) 847-1855

Alpaca House Farm
Hosts: Peter & Anne Woodyer
Farm Type: Alpaca breeders
Address: 4745 Hwy 221, RR2 Berwick, NS
Hours: 10 a.m. - 4 p.m.
Activities: A chance to see, meet, handle aCounty: Kings
nd learn about alpacas up close. Come and see why they are valuable, plus a chance to purchase alpaca fibre for spinning and yarn for knitting and weaving.
Phone: (902) 538-5583

VanOostrum Farms
Host: VanOostrum Family
Farm Type: Beef & corn maze
Address: 4931 Hwy 221, Berwick, NS
Hours: Farm tours: 12 p.m. - 3 p.m.
Corn maze: 10 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Activities: Tour the beef cattle barn and learn how the cattle are raised. Explore the Harvest Acres Corn Maze and have some farmyard fun at the activities!
Phone: (902) 538-7716

Boates Farm
Hosts: Brian, Keith & Charlotte Boates, Karma Chickoski
Farm Type: Mixed fruit, sweet cider, vinegar
Address: 432 Bligh Rd., Woodville, NS
Hours: 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Activities: U-picking apples & pears, small farm market.
Phone: (902) 678-7301

Foote Family Farm
Host: George Foote
Farm Type: Apples, bees and cider making
Address: 1972 Woodville Rd., Woodville, NS
Hours: 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Activities: Walking trails, picnic tables, U-pick apples, custom cider pressing. Honey extracting demonstration at 11:00 a.m. and cider making at 2:00 p.m. Products for sale include apples, cider, honey, beekeeping equipment and pumpkins.
Phone: (902) 678-4371

Wild Mountain Farm
Hosts: Lance & Kathleen Bishop
Farm Type: Grass-fed beef & lamb, pastured pork
Address: 8 Old Baxter's Rd., Canning, NS
Hours: 11 a.m. - 4 p.m.
Activities: Learn what it takes to raise 100% grass-fed beef & lamb and GMO free pasture raised pork. Take a tour of our farm and visit our momma pigs and their babies. Learn about pasture rotations and visit with our cattle and lamb. We have a photo booth for you to take pictures for a keepsake of your visit with us. 
Phone: (902) 582-1208

Blomidon Estate Winery
Hosts: Gordon Weld & Kyle Gallant
Farm Type: Vineyard
Address: 10318 Hwy 221, Canning, NS
Hours: 11 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Activities: Tour Blomidon Estate Winery's Vineyards with our staff and vineyard manager! Come learn about viticulture, vines, wines, and the grape harvest season. Tours at 1 p.m. and 3 p.m.
Phone: (902) 582-7565

Gates U-Pick
Hosts: Doug & Marianne Gates
Farm Type: Apples, pears & pumpkins
Address: 1269 Starr's Point Rd., Port Williams, NS
Hours: 9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Activities: We offer free wagon rides around our orchards. Tour takes approx.10 mins. We also encourage free sampling all you can eat apples while U-picking. There are washroom facilities and a picnic area.
Phone: (902) 542-9340

Taproot Farms
Hosts: Tim Carr, Patricia Bishop, Josh Oulton, & Teri Dillon
Farm Type: Certified organic, mixed fruit & vegetable, mixed livestock (CSA farm)
Address: 1736 Church St., Port Williams, NS
Hours: 11 a.m. - 3 p.m.
Activities: Trails and self-guided walking tours include: Picnic area with live music, hoop houses and field crops, animal visits, farm stay properties, large wetland area, flower crops, and labyrinth. Staff will be available to join groups or provide information. Trails will be well marked.
Phone: (902) 542-3277

Hennigar’s Farm Market
Hosts: Heather & Doug Hennigar
Farm Type: Fruits & vegetables - roadside
Address: 10272 Hwy 1, Greenwich, NS
Hours: 8 a.m. - 9 p.m.
Activities: Visit our busy farm market with all the fruits and vegetables in season on display. Play farmers golf through the apple orchard (adults: $10, children under 12: $5). Enjoy our nature trail and picnic park. Animals (goats, sheep, ducks, peacocks, and rabbits) on display.
Phone: (902) 542-3503

Willowbank U-Pick
Hosts: Johnson Family
Farm Type: Apple, pumpkin, U-pick & market
Address: 110 Starrs Point Loop, Port Williams, NS
Hours: 9 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
Activities: U-pick apples and pumpkins, market on site. Activities include petting zoo, corn maze, wagon rides, and museum. There is a picnic area and walking trails. Fees apply for produce and some activities.
Phone: (902) 542-9153

Elderkin's Farm Market
Hosts: Peter & Kevin Elderkin
Farm Type: Fruit
Address: 10362 Hwy 1, Greenwich, NS
Hours: 8 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Activities: U-Pick apples, pumpkin, squash. Others as seasonal.
Phone: (902) 542-7198

Dabro Farms
Hosts: Davidson Family
Farm Type: Dairy & farm market
Address: 105 & 237 Gaspereau River Rd., Wolfville, NS
Hours: 11:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
Activities: At 105 Gaspereau River Rd., visit our farm market, farm animal petting area, hay ride and BBQ. At 237 Gaspereau River Rd., visit our dairy operation.
Phone: (902) 670-6172


Grand Pré Wines
Host: Grand Pré Wines
Farm Type: Winery
Address: 11611 Hwy 1, Grand Pré, NS
Hours: 11 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Activities: Free wine tour & tasting at 11 a.m., 3 p.m. and 5 p.m.
Phone: (902) 542-1753

Tuesday, 9 September 2014

Not Just Garbage and Leaves (Submission Centrepost Sept 2014)


As news spreads about fall cleanup cancellation, hundreds of calls and emails are arriving. There

are a number of reasons why this service and the November leaf collection have been cut. I'd

like to cover some of these reasons and link the lack of fall cleanup to the need for us to consider

changes in municipal government.


Valley Waste is experiencing decreased revenues and increased costs (for example, lower prices

paid for recyclables on the open market and higher gas prices). Add economic hardship at some

of its municipal units, a uniform decline over many years in provincial funds to all seven waste

authorities and the crunch was on.


Plugs were pulled that would cause the least long term disruption. After staff reductions

and other less noticeable items, fall cleanup was reluctantly axed for 2014. The Town of

Hantsport was struggling, but other units also had to argue against keeping the fall cleanup

to balance their budgets.


We do get great value for our tax buck at Valley Waste. It's similar in format to other

provincially mandated authorities across Nova Scotia but consistently outranks the others

in performance. In fact, Valley Waste's Management Team and staff have provided more

at less cost during many years of services to over 40,000 households.


Centreville residents who point out that cancelling fall cleanup may have unwanted

results, including illegal dumping, are right on the money. Savings may not be as large as

expected especially if the volume of spring cleanup becomes greater causing costs to

escalate. Pitfalls were considered and are being watched to determine if any of the

changes made this year should become permanent or not.


It's not just what to do with the extras in our garages, basements or cupboards that may draw our

attention before long. The more significant issues are economic decline and outward bound youth

and families.


Change is here. Welcome or not. What we are experiencing at Valley Waste

demonstrates that counties and towns aren't islands unto themselves. What happens

down the road doesn't stop at a town or county border.


Recently, Pictou County, the Town of Pictou and the Town of New Glasgow announced

their plan to be one regional government by election time in 2016. There, a Warden and

two Mayors are planning their own replacement by one Regional Mayor. With “Now or

Never” as their rally call, they've issued an open invitation to the Towns of Stellarton,

Westville and Trenton to join them.


Here consideration of a Regional Government made a brief appearance at the Kings

Partnership Steering Committee. In the face of a reluctant Warden and Mayors it was

dropped in favour of sharing more services between cooperating but independent

municipalities. The 2050 initiative is set to launch a regional service review during the

years ahead especially if all councils show interest in sharing planning services.


Does the pending dissolution of valley towns like Hantsport and Bridgetown indicate

urgency and a need for more than change on the shared services front?


Could reducing layers of government, as Pictou plans to do by 2016, help prevent the

loss of young families, encourage more business development, and create a stronger tax

base?


Can we afford to continue spending tax dollars on duplicate administrations or must that

stop, and quickly, now that cracks are showing?


As always, I'd be pleased if any fact or opinion shared with you in this column produces

debate, opposing views or direction. I welcome your call at 902­670­2949.

Submission to UARB Impact of Tropical Storm Arthur

I want to share with you my submission to the UARB regarding the unique hardships Arthur caused rural residents when it made its visit in July. 

Receipt has been verified. It can also be accessed through the Board's website www.nsuarb.novascotia.ca by clicking on "Cases and Evidence", "Find Cases by Case Number" and inserting in "Search Term" Matter ID No. "M06321". Lots of other interesting submissions to read there too.
___________________________________________________

Dear Board Members: I understand that today is the last day that your board will officially receive comments regarding Arthur's impact. With apologies for this last minute submission, please find my comments below.


In Kings County residents of District 3 experienced power outages lasting as long as 5-days.

There can be little doubt that the length of the outage had a great impact on the overall economy. It was surely particularly hard for businesses (large or small) already operating on slim profit margins; very difficult for workers who do not have guaranteed hours and who worked for businesses that were closed for an extended period; and all those already struggling to stretch limited dollars beyond their elastic limit.

It would be worthwhile for the board to determine if there was any increase in the numbers of companies or individuals asking for credit counselling or entering receivership or bankruptcy in the months immediately following Arthur.

Where there more loan defaults?

More young families finally throwing in the towel and moving West?

While the social and economic impacts likely impacted all groups in Nova Scotia, I would like to emphasis the need for the board to look at the impact on those living in poverty and those who live a more traditional rural lifestyle.

Here in rural Nova Scotia among seniors and lower-income families there is a tendency to use “the freezer” as a way to increase food security. Through the use of a freezer, food can be obtained at economy prices and sometimes even for free, for use at a future date.

This food includes vegetables grown in backyard gardens; poultry raised at home; meats from game hunting; surplus food donated by charitable neighbours, etc.

Each of these economical sources of food require planning and/or the goodwill of neighbours. Unlike wealthier individuals who can use disposable income to go to a supermarket and replace what is lost, this food cannot be easily or quickly replaced.

First, there may be no disposal income.

Second, home grown vegetables cannot be replaced until the next growing season and/or the deer meat in the freezer cannot be replaced until the next hunting season. It is notable too that the loss of deer, moose meat, etc., from the freezer can also make the traditional foods of Mi'kmaq and First Nations families unavailable for an extended period.

Third, some of a freezer's contents may have been a gift from a concerned neighbour wishing to help a struggling neighbour or senior---replacement will depend on a future ability of that neighbour to help again.

The loss of such food can be devastating to a family's economic security and overall sense of well-being.

I trust the board will take a very hard look at appropriate compensation for all those who have been negatively impacted by Arthur. But, I would ask the board to be especially mindful of those who are already struggling to meet their family's needs.

As a municipal councillor for a rural municipality I urge you to take into consideration the impacts that are unique to rural Nova Scotia and additional to those encountered by urban residents.

Sincerely, Pauline Raven


Pauline Raven