Thursday, 21 January 2016

Kings County Municipal Airport to Close in 70-days

Is it too late to make a course correction and avoid a potential crash landing of millions of dollars of taxpayers' cash when our municipal airport closes? Council's work to relocate the Waterville airport is headed for a solution that places only municipal dollars in the kitty, and only municipal dollars at risk. We need to immediately challenge our provincial and federal infrastructure partners about that, perhaps making the investment of our dollars conditional on their financial involvement.

Time is short. I was reminded of that last week when a "sore-of-heart" Kings County resident forwarded CAO Tom MacEwan's January 8, 2016 letter to Transport Canada. It read: “This will confirm that operations at the Waterville Municipal Airport shall cease on March 31, 2016 and following the closure date, the airport will no longer be available for air operations of any kind.”

The impact of decisions evolve. Realities change. Time marches forward. Since the decision to sell airport lands to Michelin and relocate the airport I've continued to look for a win-win-win situation for taxpayers, aviators, and Michelin, despite frustrating and sometimes surprising circumstances.

We began with a primary focus on new jobs and secondary focus of relocating the airport. An expansion will raise Michelin's commercial property evaluation and additional tax revenues beyond the one million dollars currently collected each year from the tire giant will be welcome. Council has been encouraged by Deputy Warden Hirtle to not think in terms of “if” the expansion happens, but “when”, and to think of that when as “soon”.

Why then, aren't we actively pursuing a financial role for provincial and federal governments. There will be greater growth in their income tax revenues than the county's property tax revenues once hundreds of new Michelin jobs are realized.

The remaining condition for the county's involvement in establishing the conditions for civil aviation activities at 14-Wing is a solid business case to justify the expenditure of millions of taxpayers' dollars. The job of exploring the business case was contracted to the MMM Group who estimate “a small but tangible impact on the economy of the Annapolis Valley” for a general aviation airport. Somewhere between year three and ten they report employment equivalent to ten full time jobs. With this fairly weak business case, the MMM Group first related the spending of 1.5 million dollars in terms of compensation to hangar owners. It's now referenced as a “relocation allowance”.

The business case as tabled, does not make a case for a sound investment of taxpayers dollars in the regional economy. But the Freedom Aviation Society, and its hard-working chairman Paul Easson, of Easson's Transport, pressed on. Continued hard work to attract businesses to the future 14-Wing location is bearing fruit. Perhaps because the case has been made that the facilities there, spectacular runways and 24-hour air traffic control, can't be rivalled by an independent civilian airport in a small county like ours.

Easson reports that a charter flight company, a flight school and an airfreight operation are likely. We are told that DND will be able to make room for these interests despite the current small footprint set currently aside for general aviation. It is also notable and laudable that Freedom Aviation seems to have secured confidence in the Greenwood location among nearly all those who currently use the municipal airport at Waterville

For me, two major concerns remain.

One. The county plans to spend every penny realized from the Michelin sale (almost $2 Million) to locate a general aviation airport at 14-Wing Greenwood. If heightened security concerns should arise, our investment would quickly come undone.

Two. Our provincial government initiated this sale to Michelin and the Department of National Defence is likely to be left with significant new infrastructure, including a large hangar, if, for security reasons, DND must boot all civilians off its base.

Why is only municipal taxpayer's money being used and placed at such risk? Given the great potential for tax revenues that the Michelin expansion will bring, at the very least the provincial and federal governments should be asked to guarantee this use of county taxpayers' funds.

Both the federal and provincial governments could be asked to place a third of these funds in trust with payment made to the county if our investment does become undone by heightened security concerns.

The bitter medicine of the closure of the much loved municipal airport at Waterville on March 31, 2016, will be sweetened if we hear in the weeks ahead that sod-turning on the Michelin expansion is as imminent as Deputy Warden Hirtle expects.


It appears closure can't be further delayed because the county must collect the money from the land sale to Michelin as soon as possible. The airport community has been virtually silent if dissatisfied with this date. Without Michelin's cash for the purchase, the infrastructure needed at Greenwood can't be built. That translates to a lack of a home-base for the 48 aviators the Freedom Aviation Society has lined up for its move to Greenwood. March 31, 2016 at time of writing is 70-days away.

Monday, 18 January 2016

Life's most persistent and urgent question? What are you doing for others.

Question posed and answered by Martin Luther King Junior. Today is Martin Luther King Day.

Here in the Annapolis Valley we see many volunteers doing many things for others.

Martin Luther King's life celebrated small and large acts of kindness and courage.

His actions changed and world and others are now challenged to complete the changes needed.

Tuesday, 5 January 2016

Council items tonight January 5 2016

Some of the items on tonight's agenda that might peek your interest in attendance at 6PM in council chambers following a Public Hearing...

  • General Aviation Business Case & Governance Study 14 Wing Greenwood
  • Waterville Business Park
  • Kentville Library
  • Roles, Responsibilities and Goals & Objectives of the CA
  • Recommendations from Budget and Finance Committee:

Click here for the complete January 5 2015 Agenda

The Budget and Finance Committee is bringing forward

  • Strategic Priorities
  • Kings Point-to Point, Trans County Transportation Society, Valley Search and Rescue
  • Capital Budget Project Sheet
  • Multi-Year Community Grant Commitments
  • Service Partners
  • Budget Process Timelines
  • Evaluation of Grant Applications
  • Multi-Year Community Grant Commitments - Defeated Motion

Kings County Mayor & Boundary Review Update

All eleven councillors have supported an historic motion to elect a Kings County Mayor. This will happen in the upcoming municipal elected set for October, 2016. This irreversible change leaves an outdated Warden system behind. My previous post outlines why I think this is a very good thing.

Council has also approved a motion aimed at reducing by three the number of councillors to be elected in 2016. This motion passed by a narrow margin.

While the election of a Mayor does not require approval from the Utility and Review Board (UARB), the boundary changes required to elect eight instead of eleven councillors requires an application to the UARB and approval by the UARB before coming into effect.

Council engaged professional services to help with the decisions made in December at a cost of $26,144. The resulting report by Stantec recommended a reduction from eleven to nine, not eight, districts. For me, the consultant's recommendation was sound and untainted by any notion of political interference. Notably, it was supported by a scientific survey and three public meetings. The report did provide boundary recommendations for eight districts in the event that councillors wanted further reductions than indicated by the survey and public meetings.

Nevertheless, council was not afforded an opportunity to vote on the consultant's recommendation because Deputy Warden Hirtle and Councillor Atwater were permitted to bring forward a motion to approve alternate boundaries for eight districts.

This alternate had been requested by Deputy Warden Hirtle and it was supported by a majority of six (Hirtle, Atwater, Brothers, Best, Ennis and Lloyd) when a vote was called.

Since then the Advertiser has published three articles about the controversial "in-house-alternate" eight district boundary map. It is likely that presentations will be made by a variety of individuals when the UARB holds its required public consultation. A date has yet to be set.

I am taking the time to do my own analysis of the boundaries and should have more details to post in the weeks immediately ahead. Click here for the Kings Governance and Electoral Boundary Review Final Report. Skip to page 59 for a description and map of the proposed eight district boundaries approved by council. These boundaries hold big changes for the community of Centreville (it joins Canning) and Meadowview (it joins Coldbrook).

Please do not hesitate to be in touch if you have any questions or if you want to discuss this issue in more detail. I can be reached at 902-670-2949.

Tuesday, 1 December 2015

Kings County Citizens Want a Mayor

Have your heard that two of three Kings County residents have a strong preference for electing a Mayor for Kings County in 2016? Consultants surveyed 386 randomly selected residents this fall and found people want to elect a Mayor, even though they were informed that once the switch to Mayor is made there is no way to revert to the Warden system.

This could mean that when county voters head to the polls in October, 2016, they will be marking their ballot with a choice for Mayor as well as a choice for councillor. In other words, the people, not councillors, will choose who will lead and represent the county.

A citizen initiated petition, delivered to council in October, also showed strong support (600 plus signatures) for electing a Mayor for Kings County. Pierre Clouthier, a resident of New Minas, presented the petition results. He used a graphic of a horse and buggy to illustrate why it is now possible to leave the “outdated” Warden system behind.

When Kings County was incorporated in 1879 and Kentville was incorporated in 1886, counties elected Wardens and towns elected Mayors. 

Why? According to Clouthier reasons were practical and related to travel constraints. It was the time of horses and buggies and rutted roads. It was therefore impossible for Mayoral candidates to campaign in all areas of the county. 

Towns didn't have this geographic problem so residents were given the advantage of electing their own Mayor. More than 100 years later, with cars, faster mail, and social media, county candidates for Mayor can campaign county wide.

The most negative opinion I heard at one of the public consultation meetings about the current Warden system was this... Becoming a Warden can push people to “make backroom deals”. Once a simple majority of councillors is drawn to a Warden a voting block can be produced. Agendas can then be controlled and perks provided to those districts represented by members of said voting block.

In contrast, a successful Mayor must put a platform before voters. A Mayor provides an independent leader who, once elected, is responsible to all residents, more so than councillors. More transparent representation and fairer application of the general taxpayer's dollar may have a better chance.

Fewer districts are also likely to be recommended by the consultant based on survey results. Council will vote on the number of districts, 8-10 (versus the current 11 districts), as well as the change to a Mayor (versus remaining with a Warden) no later than mid January. Council's decision will then be further examined, approved or adjusted by the Utility and Review Board. Please do not hesitate to be in touch if you have any questions or comments.


Kings County Residents are saying: “Leave Warden System Behind” and many are inclined to reduce the number of councillors too. 

Please do not hesitate to be in touch if you have questions about this or any other council or community issue. 902.670.2949.

Monday, 19 October 2015

Survey Monkey... A way to have your say at MOK!


Survey One: About the number of councillors and if electing a mayor is a good idea

A marketing consultant in Bedford is conducting a random telephone survey of County residents over the next month. Residents are being urged to cooperate if called. About 300 responses will be registered by the consultants. 

All residents have an opportunity to provide opinions on the say types of questions... number of councillors, if Warden or Mayor leadership is best.

The Survey can be found if you follow this link at Survey Monkey... a free online survey service.

The survey takes about 5-minutes.

Monday, 5 October 2015

Regional Governance Study for Kings County

Hot on the heels of news about discussion opening between the Chair of the Village Commission of New Minas and the Mayors of Kentville and Wolfville, the Warden of the County finally brought forward a timeline for the stalled study of regional governance. 

During Kings Partnership Steering Committee discussions it was decided that the study should be stalled until the province released its third year of fiscal condition data for municipalities across the province. That data was released almost one year ago. It showed the Town of Berwick's fiscal condition is the least robust among the four municipalities of Kings County.


It was a pleasant surprise at the October 1, 2015, Special Council meeting, to see the Warden move an addition to the agenda that introduced motions putting the study back into play. Prior attempts by other councillors had been rebuffed. I'm looking forward to seeing terms of reference by January 1, 2016, and having this necessary work proceed in the new year. To date, there has been 2-years of unnecessary delay.